The business model for bringing lucrative new pharmaceutical drugs to market includes very robust marketing budgets, and 9 out of 10 pharmaceutical companies spend more on advertising than they do on research. And why not? Americans spend an average of $1000 per person, per year on pharmaceutical drugs, and the effort to capture these dollars is leading more companies to fast track or even fabricate the research involved in bringing a new drug to market.
Here’s a look at how much the largest pharmaceutical companies spent on marketing vs. expenditures on research and development in 2013:
The push to push drugs on the American people is heavily dependent on the ability to produce favorable research that backs any and all claims that marketing departments wish to make about the drug in order for it to stand out in the competitive field of retail drug sales. Thanks to the admissions of some of the most influential people in this industry, we are now discovering that much of the research being presented in support of many new drugs, vaccines and procedures is fake, and even leading medical journals are agreeing that big pharma manipulates medical research at the expense of public health.Consider the following statements and admissions by very important people who are close enough to the inner workings of the industry to know for sure just how bad the public is being deceived.
In 2015, the editor of one of the world’s most respected medical journals, The Lancet, went public with his admission that research fraud was rampant in the field of medical clinical research:
The following clip is from the documentary ‘One More Girl,’ about the startlingly damaging effects of the Gardasil vaccine. In the clip, former Pfizer Vice President, Dr. Peter Rost candidly discusses the truth about the influence of money in the pharmaceutical industry. Dr. Rost wrote the book, The Whistleblower, Confessions of a Healthcare Hitmanto contribute to the growing body of evidence that blows the whistle on corporate fraud within the medical establishment.
Dependence on so-called clinical research to support the claims made by pharmaceutical marketing departments is proving to be dangerously misled. Can the public trust the medical establishment to bring effective and safe medicines to market? Increasingly, the evidence is suggesting that it is not.
Eighteen Irish teenage girls have recently come forward claiming to be suffering acute physical side-effects from the controversial HPV anti-cervical cancer vaccine administered in their schools. Parents came forward after the Sunday Independent revealed similar claims of suffering from 131 young women a weekend ago.
These new allegations have surfaced since a doctor in Denmark (where Gardasil is no longer used) linked some chronic symptoms to the vaccination. In Denmark, one in 500 girls display a range of side-effects, there are 143 Irish teenagers are now suffering debilitating health issues, and we know girls in the US are suffering as well. Because of this, expert petitions are underway in France and Spain to ban its use, and Japan has stopped recommending the vaccine all together.
THOUSANDS
of adverse reactions to the lifesaving cervical cancer jab are being
recorded by health chiefs every year, The Sunday Post can reveal.
Campaigners
last night said the vaccine should no longer be given to schoolgirls
until more is found out about the side-effects of the Human Papilloma
Virus (HPV) vaccine.
The Post’s figures show more than 6,000
suspected adverse reactions to the jab have been recorded across the UK
since 2012, including 340 in Scotland.
However, campaigners claim
this is just the tip of the iceberg as health chiefs estimate they only
receive reports about 10% of all suspected adverse reactions, suggesting
tens of thousands could have suffered similarly.
More than eight
million HPV jabs have been given to girls aged 12 and 13 in the UK since
2008 and the vaccination programme is credited with saving 400 lives
every year.
But pressure is growing for the authorities to get a
better understanding of the side-effects as the figures obtained by The
Post show one person south of the Border died this year as a result of a
suspected adverse reaction to the HPV jab.
MSPs on Holyrood’s
petitions committee agreed to ask SNP ministers for their view on
campaigners’ calls to hold a roundtable discussion on the safety of the
vaccine, involving medical and scientific experts from both sides of the
debate.
Gardasil,
a vaccine for the Human Papillomavirus (HPV), has been labeled as a
controversial since it has been made available. Although beneficial in
preventing cancer within the girls that receive the vaccine, the side
effects that some are experiencing can be debilitating for many girls.
Those side effects have many wondering if the drug is safe enough for
human use.
Common
side effects of being vaccinated with Gardasil include nausea,
headaches, and even fainting at the time of the vaccination, or shortly
after, according to the Independent.
However, more extreme side effects are more serious and longer lasting,
often times permanent. They include chronic fatigue, chronic regional
pain syndrome, postural tachycardia syndrome, and fibromyalgia,
according to Jesper Mehlsen of the Frederiksberg Hospital in Denmark.
Mehlsen
was quick to point out that the conditions have not been proven to be
caused by Gardasil, but there is a growing trend among girls that have
received the vaccine and are experiencing the exact same conditions over
time.
“We have noted a pattern of
symptoms in a relatively large group of patients and that these symptoms
seem to have a temporal association to the vaccination.”
[Photo by Russell Kirk/Merck & Co. via Getty Images]ARecently,
18 teenage girls came forward to report debilitating side effects after
taking Gardasil, joining the growing number of teens across the world
that have experienced harmful side effects after taking Gardasil. In
Ireland, about 131 girls have been identified, and in Denmark, over
1,100 hundred girls suffer from Gardasil side effects, according to the Independent.
The number of reported drastic side effects in America vary depending
on the study that is read. However, reports of negative and debilitating
side effects from around the world have led nearly 40 percent of
American parents to not vaccinate their children from HPV.
In
April of this year, the Australian federal government officially joined
the state Queensland and Victoria governments and declared war on our
children and our community.
A choice of whether to become homeless . . . or vaccinate?
A choice of being able to feed and clothe their families . . . or vaccinate?
I don’t know about you, but if that is a “choice” then so is blackmail.
Add
this to the Victorian government’s law that all unvaccinated children
must be banned from early childhood education and you will see that. for
some governments in Australia, the idea of segregating children is a
good thing. So much for the government’s commitment to Universal Access to Early Childhood Education?
CDC exposed as private corporation colluding with Big Pharma to defraud American taxpayers: see the evidence
Thursday, December 03, 2015 by: Ethan A. Huff, staff writer
(NaturalNews)
The illusory notion that the federal regulatory agency known as the
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is somehow a public
entity working on behalf of the people to protect us all from disease is
simply laughable.
The CDC, by definition, is a private corporation
working on behalf of its stakeholders, which include key players in the
pharmaceutical and vaccine industries that profit from the spread of disease, not from real prevention and cures.
D&B
is a Fortune 500 company based in New Jersey that maintains databases
on more than 235 million companies worldwide – it's a who's who of the
global business climate, and is recognized as one of the first companies
to be publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE).
Here's a screenshot of the CDC's listing on D&B, courtesy of the AntiCorruption Society:
Big Pharma and the CDC: one in the same
Anyone
who tries to argue with you that the CDC is looking out for public
safety as its first priority just needs to take a glance at D&B to
see that the CDC is actually looking out for its own bottom line,
and that of its corporate allies. Which brings us into our second piece
of evidence that the CDC is a corrupt, drug-pandering sham – many of
the CDC's top health "experts" have ties to the pharmaceutical industry.
These two companies, as reported by The Guardian in 2010, paid off policymakers in multiple countries, including in the U.S. (at the CDC),
to write the WHO's guidelines for swine flu that pushed dangerous swine
flu vaccines on millions of people globally. With the help of the CDC
and other corrupt agencies, these pharmaceutical corporations pocketed
billions of dollars.
"The tentacles of drug company influence are
in all levels in the decision-making process," stated Paul Flynn, a
British Member of Parliament who spoke out against this racket as it was
occurring.
The
CDC has also been complicit in forging fake science to push other
dangerous vaccines like the MMR jab for measles, mumps and rubella. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. blew the lid on this scandal that same year,
outing now-shamed scientist Poul Thorsen for stealing $2 million in
research money while covering up the link between MMR and autism, which
the CDC ate right up in its quest to protect the reputation of MMR.
Top CDC scientist Dr. William Thompson has also since come forward as a whistleblower
to expose the CDC for manipulating research findings that showed MMR
causes autism at a disproportionately higher rate in young black boys
compared to other children – though MMR causes autism in all types of children, this same research found.
"All
that is needed is for folks to educate themselves and join the many
good people (professionals and non-professionals) working to get the
truth out."
The
NaturalNews Network is a non-profit collection of public education
websites covering topics that empower individuals to make positive
changes in their health, environmental sensitivity, consumer choices and
informed skepticism. The NaturalNews Network is owned and operated by
Truth Publishing International, Ltd., a Taiwan corporation. It is not
recognized as a 501(c)3 non-profit in the United States, but it
operates without a profit incentive, and its key writer, Mike Adams,
receives absolutely no payment for his time, articles or books other
than reimbursement for items purchased in order to conduct product
reviews.
The vast majority of our content is freely given away at
no charge. We offer thousands of articles and dozens of downloadable
reports and guides (like the Honest Food Guide)
that are designed to educate and empower individuals, families and
communities so that they may experience improved health, awareness and
life fulfillment.
CDC scientists held meeting to destroy autism-vaccine documents, reveals CDC whistleblower
Thursday, December 03, 2015 by: Julie Wilson staff writer
(NaturalNews) The results of a 2004 study by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) discovered a significant
link between the MMR vaccine (measles, mumps and rubella) and autism in
African American boys vaccinated under or around the age 36 months;
however, if it weren't for one whistleblower, you would not have been
privy to any of this, because the evidence was deliberately covered up.
Dr.
William Thompson, currently a senior scientist at the CDC, recently
made a shocking admission that he and his colleagues specifically
arranged a meeting to destroy important documents related to the
study in an attempt to withhold information from the public regarding a
link between the MMR vaccine and autism.
As first reported by Sharyl Attkisson, a former CBS News journalist turned independent investigative reporter, Dr. Thompson and the study co-authors "scheduled a meeting to destroy documents related to the study.
"The
remaining four co-authors all met and brought a big garbage can into
the meeting room, and reviewed and went through all the hardcopy
documents that we had thought we should discard, and put them into a
huge garbage can."
"The omitted data suggested that African
American males who received the MMR vaccine before age 36 months were at
increased risk for autism." – CDC Senior Science Dr. William Thompson
However, aware that destroying documents
in this manner was both illegal and unethical, Dr. Thompson kept hard
copies of all the documents that had been disposed of, as well as
maintained all associated computer files.
After securing a
whistleblower attorney, Dr. Thompson came forward with his admission,
providing relevant documents in August 2014 to the office of Rep. Bill
Posey (R-Florida), who presented details of the cover-up on the floor of
the U.S. House of Representatives.
Posey, who maintains that he is "pro-vaccine," read the following quote by Dr. Thompson on the House floor:
My
primary job duties while working in the immunization safety branch from
2000 to 2006, were to later co-lead three major vaccine safety studies.
The MADDSP, MMR autism cases control study was being carried out in
response to the Wakefield-Lancet study that suggested an association
between the MMR vaccine and an autism-like health outcome. There
were several major concerns among scientists and consumer advocates
outside the CDC in the fall of 2000, regarding the execution of the
Verstraeten Study. One of the important goals that was determined up
front, in the spring of 2001, before any of these studies started, was
to have all three protocols vetted outside the CDC
prior to the start of the analyses so consumer advocates could not
claim that we were presenting analyses that suited our own goals and
biases. We hypothesized that if we found statistically
significant effects at either 18 or 36 month thresholds, we would
conclude that vaccinating children early with MMR vaccine could lead to
autism-like characteristics or features. We all met and finalized the study
protocol and analysis plan. The goal was to not deviate from the
analysis plan to avoid the debacle that occurred with the Verstraeten
thimerosal study published in Pediatrics in 2003. At the Sept 5th meeting
we discussed in detail how to code race for both the sample and the
birth certificate sample. At the bottom of table 7, it also shows that
for the non-birth certificate sample, the adjusted race effect
statistical significance was huge. All the authors and I
met and decided sometime between August and September 2002, not to
report any race effects from the paper. Sometime soon after the meeting,
we decided to exclude reporting any race effects. The co-authors scheduled a meeting to destroy documents related to the study. The
remaining four co-authors all met and brought a big garbage can into
the meeting room, and reviewed and went through all the hardcopy
documents that we had thought we should discard, and put them into a
huge garbage can. However, because I assumed it was illegal
and would violate both FOIA and DOJ requests, I kept hardcopies of all
documents in my office, and I retain all associated computer files. I
believe we intentionally withheld controversial findings from the final
draft of the Pediatrics paper.
The CDC and Dr.
Thompson's co-author Dr. Frank DeStefano, CDC Director of Immunization
Safety, continue to defend the study as originally published.
A July 29 Tweet by Attkisson states:
So far, no hearings scheduled and no known inquiry of the alleged scientific misconduct.
The
NaturalNews Network is a non-profit collection of public education
websites covering topics that empower individuals to make positive
changes in their health, environmental sensitivity, consumer choices and
informed skepticism. The NaturalNews Network is owned and operated by
Truth Publishing International, Ltd., a Taiwan corporation. It is not
recognized as a 501(c)3 non-profit in the United States, but it
operates without a profit incentive, and its key writer, Mike Adams,
receives absolutely no payment for his time, articles or books other
than reimbursement for items purchased in order to conduct product
reviews.
The vast majority of our content is freely given away at
no charge. We offer thousands of articles and dozens of downloadable
reports and guides (like the Honest Food Guide)
that are designed to educate and empower individuals, families and
communities so that they may experience improved health, awareness and
life fulfillment.
Roughly
80 Norwegian college students have reportedly contracted mumps. Of the
80, many reportedly were previously vaccinated with the MMR vaccine,
which, by all logical and reasonable accounts, should have protected
them. However, Norwegian health officials are making excuses over the
matter.
Several
of those who are now sick with mumps are Norwegian students who have
previously received two doses of MMR vaccine is recommended.
It is
possible to get sick with mumps even if you have been fully vaccinated
against the disease, confirming Margrethe Greve-Isdahl, chief physician
at the Department of vaccine, Public Health (FHI).
The Norway Institute for Public Health, or Folkehelseinstituttet has
announced a mumps outbreak, primarily among university students. The
first reported cases were in the Trondheim area–the Norwegian technical
and University of Science and Technology (NTNU) and the University
College of Sør-Trøndelag (HIST) in late October.
Norway/CIA
Now the case count hovers around 80 and health officials expect the cases to increase in coming weeks.
Several
of those who are now sick with mumps are Norwegian students who have
previously received two doses of MMR vaccine is recommended.
It is
possible to get sick with mumps even if you have been fully vaccinated
against the disease, confirming Margrethe Greve-Isdahl, chief physician
at the Department of vaccine, Public Health (FHI).
In Norway, the
vaccine against mumps in the MMR vaccine (measles, mumps and rubella)
offered in the childhood immunization. First dose offered to children at
15 months of age and second dose at 11 years of age (6th grade). FHI
generally recommend that all who have not received two doses of MMR
vaccine are eligible for this. This also applies to students who come to
Norway. Upon initial vaccination is recommended that at least three
months between doses, but there is a benefit to the immune response if
it goes longer.
Following
is a public comment made by Barbara Loe Fisher, NVIC Co-founder &
President, at the Nov. 13, 2015 meeting of the FDA Vaccines &
Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) on proposed
changes to FDA requirements for licensure of vaccines intended for use
during pregnancy
Birth defects, chromosomal damage,
premature birth, low birth weight, pregnancy complications and sudden
infant death syndrome, not infectious diseases, are the leading causes
of death for about 23,000 infants dying before their first birthday in
the US every year, with half of those deaths occurring on the first day
of life. 1 2 Women getting pregnant and
delivering babies in America today have more than twice the risk of
dying during pregnancy, childbirth or within one year of giving birth
than they did three decades ago, with heart failure, high blood pressure
and stroke, diabetes, and blood clots being among the leading causes of
death. 3 4
In 2006, CDC officials directed doctors to give all pregnant women a flu shot 5 and, in 2011, a Tdap shot during every pregnancy, no matter how little time has elapsed between pregnancies. 6
Prior to FDA licensure, influenza, diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis
vaccines were not tested in or proven safe and effective for pregnant
women in large clinical trials when given during every pregnancy either
singly or simultaneously. 7 8
Categorized by FDA as Pregnancy Category B and C biologicals 9
because it is not known whether the vaccines are genotoxic and can
cause fetal harm or can affect maternal fertility and reproduction,
administering influenza and Tdap vaccines to pregnant women is an
off-label use of these vaccines. 10 11 12 It is a policy that assumes maternal vaccination is necessary, safe and effective without proving it. 13
The Return of Whooping Cough in High Vaccination Areas
Pertussis (whooping cough) has re-emerged in countries with high vaccination coverage and low mortality. Although it is listed as one
of the top causes of vaccine preventable deaths, reports of a global
resurgence originated in countries with low mortality and high
vaccination coverage. Priorities are to decrease infant mortality by
improving coverage and timeliness of vaccination and implementing
pertussis surveillance, but vaccinations don’t seem to be working and
this is of great concern.
More
recently some countries with sustained high vaccine coverage have
experienced increases in pertussis, especially in older children and
adults, the reasons for which are complex. The issue may stem from under
diagnosis or missed diagnosis and under-reporting, which hinder
surveillance, as well as gaps in our knowledge of levels of herd
immunity generated by the vaccination programs.Whooping cough is a
relatively new infectious disease afflicting human beings, compared with
other infectious diseases, and is undergoing a resurgence despite
decades of vaccination.
One study found
that the body's response to a pertussis infection was correlated with
vaccination status. There was a primary response in unvaccinated
children.
Another study in the Center For Infectious Disease Dynamics
showed that pertussis vaccination actually enhances the colonization
Bordetella parapertussis, the bacteria that causes pertussis, and that
the vaccination itself may have contributed to the observed increase in whooping cough over the last decade.
How common is whooping cough in a non-vaccinating country?
In Sweden,
general vaccination with a whole cell pertussis vaccine was recommended
from 1953. In 1979 the recommendation was withdrawn because the
Swedish-made vaccine had become ineffective. In order to determine the
incidence of the disease in a non-vaccinating country, 400 children born
in 1980 were randomly selected from the population register of
Goteborg, Sweden. The parents of the children were interviewed in 1990,
when the children were 10 years old. The parents of 377 children could
be reached, and of those 372 were not vaccinated against pertussis. Of
the nonvaccinated children 61% had experienced clinically typical
whooping cough; 195 (119 with and 76 without a history of whooping
cough) agreed to donate a serum sample for determination of antibodies
against pertussis toxin, filamentous hemagglutinin and pertactin. Of the
children with a history of whooping cough, 91% had antibodies against
pertussis toxin, as had 64% of the children without a history of
disease. All but 3 children had antibodies against filamentous
hemagglutinin and all 195 children had antibodies against pertactin. The
antibody titers against the 2 last mentioned proteins did not differ
between children with and without a history of whooping cough or between
children with and without antibodies against pertussis toxin.
In
light of the solid Swedish study why is the rest of the world still
heavily vaccinating its citizens for whooping cough / pertussis when it has proven unsuccessful
and appears to be increasing in the vaccinated groups? Could this
enzyme deficiency in vaccinated subjects be linked to a lack of
naturally occurring anti-bodies? From the time we are born our body’s
immune system begins to create anti-bodies and depending on the region
of birth they create anti-bodies specifically to the threats of their
own community. In the western world we heavily vaccine children
beginning at childbirth, is this resurgence of pertussis the result of
not having their own antibodies due to a life time of vaccinations, this
avenue of thought must be considered regardless of the outcome or the
profits lost in the world wide vaccination programs?
It used to be
that infants were not vaccinated as early as today they allowed 6
months for the child’s own immune defense to develop now they are
vaccinated before leaving the hospitals. How can the individuals immune
system develop if they are being shut down or altered with vaccinations,
how can they hope to adapt to new virus protection when bacteria begin
mutating? Do you think what is done in a laboratory is more efficient
than what is done within the body pertaining to the individual needs and
region to where they live? Will we look back at this generation and see
the errors of our ways when antibiotics fail or will we line up for
vaccinations each time a new strain of bacteria is discovered since we
no longer have our own immune defense? This is an age of discovery but
the question that remains unanswered is what the discovery will be?
Products to help build our immunity are: Laktokhan, Colloidal Silver, Full Spectrum Digestive Enzyme, Zinc Picolinate, Thymus Gland and L-Lysine.
Gardasil®-related
fatal myocardial infarction in a teenage boy – case filed in United
States Court of Federal Claims Office of Special Masters.
Gomez versus USDOH: Petition No. 15-0160V1
filed by the Roberts Law Firm of Newport Beach, California for
petitioners Adan Gomez and Raquel Ayon, on behalf of their deceased son
Joel Gomez, states:
Joel Gomez received a Merck
Gardasil vaccine on June 19, 2013 and again on August 19, 2013, and died
in his sleep the following day on August 20, 2013. The death was caused
in fact by receiving the Gardasil Vaccine.
This statement is reinforced by a supportive Expert Report written by Sin Hang Lee, MD, stating:
Gardasil® did cause or contributed to a myocardial infarction in the decedent, and that the second dose of Gardasil®finally
caused a fatal hypotension in this case on the day of vaccination.
There was no other plausible cause for the death of Joel Gomez at the
night of August 19, 2013.
The record shows that Joel
Gomez, the decedent, a 14-year old healthy boy who had regular visits to
the pediatrician’s office for periodic check-ups since birth showed no
evidence of any pre-existing health issues, specifically no evidence of
cardiac abnormalities, psychological disorders or substance abuse. The
teenager had been training for the high school football team from four
to five hours a day for the two months prior to his death without
incident.
Fundamentally,
biological warfare is sneaky. It involves a microbial sucker punch to
its intended target, often accomplished in a manner in which the
aggressor can claim clean hands, while his victim may suffer or die.
Biological
warfare can take a number of forms. The question—how can you get a
bacteriological or toxic agent on board without the target being
alerted– has been asked and answered. In addition to using humans and
animals as vectors, biological warfare agents can be airborne,
waterborne, foodborne or put into pharmaceuticals.
Substantial
concerns have been voiced concerning the potential for inserting
bioweapons into vaccines. Indeed, given the history of known
contaminated vaccines, this is hardly a matter of speculation. Polio
vaccines have been found to contain cancer. A Merck rotavirus vaccine
was found to be contaminated with a pig virus. Another Merck product,
the Hepatitis B vaccine, was reported to have been laced with the AIDS
virus. In addition, a tetanus vaccine distributed in the Third World was
found to contain human chorionic gonadotrophin, an anti-fertility agent
known to produce spontaneous abortions.
The correlation between the rise in vaccinations of children and autism has become an urban legend.
A
Bill has just passed the US Senate, mandating that the US Department of
Veteran Affairs ensure that all veterans receive immunizations
(vaccines) per a draconian schedule. At this juncture, active military
must receive over a dozen vaccines. This piece of legislation is
therefore an effort to extend the vaccine mandate to those who have
previously served their country.
After
reading this I couldn’t help but feel the wind release from my sails. A
Concordia University professor named Genevieve Rail won a Federal grant
of $270k to study the HPV vaccine. After studying it, she condemned it;
and now no one is happy. She also said there was no proof that HPV
causes cervical cancer. This flies directly in the face of a nobel prize
winning discovery which states that it does.
Rail has publicly attacked the HPV vaccine and that’s caused severe backlash. Check out the quotes from the National Post.
“This
is akin to funding research that purports to show tobacco smoking does
not cause lung cancer,” charged Eduardo Franco, head of cancer
epidemiology at McGill University. “And that tobacco cessation, rather
than helping reduce risk, is actually causing harm … CIHR would not
fund such a study, would it?”
Marc Steben, a Montreal family doctor and chair of the Canadian Network on HPV Prevention, was more blunt.
“I don’t know who was on her (grant awarding) jury,” he said. “Someone was really sleeping.” (full story is here)
Thursday, October 15, 2015 by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
(NaturalNews)
Remember the Ebola outbreak of 2014 when nurses infected with Ebola
were proclaimed "cured" through the intervention of pharmaceutical
medicine? Like everything else the MSM broadcast about Ebola, we now
know it was all a sinister fabrication.
Texas nurse Nina
Pham was widely celebrated as a hero by the mainstream media for her
role in treating an infected Ebola patient that started an outbreak in a
Dallas hospital. What the media didn't tell you is that Nina Pham was nearly killed by the Ebola "treatment" medicines
administered by the hospital. "Nina Pham, the first known case of an
individual contracting Ebola within the U.S., is now suing the parent
corporation of her former employer, which she says violated her personal
privacy and left her chronically ill by exploiting and neglecting her
during the outbreak," Natural News reported earlier this year.
"The
26-year-old nurse says she now suffers from constant nightmares, body
aches and insomnia due to the experimental medications that were forced
upon her while in isolation."
Pharmaceutical interventions, in other words, caused serious organ damage to nurse Pham,
and that damage is permanent. Naturally, the CDC-controlled media
exploited Pham for P.R. purposes, but once the news had passed, they
left her permanently damaged and abandoned by the system.
A second nurse is also in serious health trouble due to toxic Ebola treatments
Now reported in The Independent (UK):
"A British nurse who was apparently cured of Ebola earlier this year is
now in a critical condition, doctors have said, with experts expressing
astonishment at the deterioration of her condition."
Pauline
Cafferkey was admitted to the specialist treatment isolation unit at
Royal Free Hospital in London on 9 October. She had been treated for
Ebola at the same hospital earlier this year, and was discharged in good
health in January.
None of us here at Natural News are surprised, of course. We've long known that everything the medical establishment says about Ebola is a deliberate lie, and that includes pharmaceutical Ebola "treatment" promises.
"The
exact nature of Ms Cafferkey’s illness is not known, but experts have
expressed shock at the severity of her condition," reports The
Independent.
Here's what's really going on: In exactly the same way that AIDS
drugs destroy the human immune system and cause symptoms of AIDS, Ebola
drugs also destroy the patient's body and cause critical organ failure.
This fundamental truth about the toxicity of Big Pharma's deadly drugs will never be admitted in the pharma-controlled press.
Same system that pushes toxic pharmaceutical treatments viciously attacks colloidal silver
As
you ponder all this, keep in mind that all holistic treatments for
Ebola were viciously and aggressively attacked by governments and the
media during the Ebola outbreak. Those who offered colloidal silver
treatments or products were threatened by U.S. regulators and mocked by
the media... even though colloidal silver is a non-toxic treatment that cannot cause the kind of organ failure we're witnessing from pharmaceutical interventions.
Non-profits such as Dr. Rima Laibow's Natural Solutions Foundation were even viciously threatened by the IRS
after Dr. Laibow began talking about colloidal silver as a non-toxic
treatment option. (No doubt the CDC pressured the IRS to target the NSF
in the same way the IRS targets liberty-oriented non-profits.)
"The
IRS sent us a warning letter saying that by sharing US Department of
Defense Threat Reduction Agency declassified research on the impact of
our particular Nano Silver 10 PPM on the ability of the Ebola virus to
cause disease we had miraculously turned the substance into a drug," Dr.
Laibow told Natural News. "We responded to them in detail (26 pages, if
I recall properly) and they sent back another letter backing off a bit
but demanding changes in our site."
Meanwhile, companies that sold
high-grade medicinal essential oils such as doTerra were threatened by
government regulators with being put out of business if they didn't
police their independent distributors who were sharing the true news
that many essential oils can kill Ebola.
The medical system, government and media essentially invoked an all-out WAR on natural medicine
while claiming their own pharmaceuticals were the only safe treatments
for Ebola. Now we see just what a farce those claims really were. Much
like chemotherapy, the "treatment" for Ebola may be just as deadly as
Ebola itself.
Meanwhile, all the truly SAFE treatments like
colloidal silver have been intentionally disparaged, marginalized and
pushed to the fringes of alternative medicine. It's no coincidence that colloidal silver can't be patented and is universally available for mere pennies, thereby threatening the more important aspect of Big Pharma's disease pandemic schemes: PROFITS!
Here
at Natural News, our prayers go out to Pauline Cafferkey with the hope
that she won't end up as yet another needless victim of Big Pharma's
toxic treatments and the mainstream media's outrageous lies that misled
medical staff into falsely believing that pharmaceutical treatments for
Ebola are safe. Sources for this article include:
The
NaturalNews Network is a non-profit collection of public education
websites covering topics that empower individuals to make positive
changes in their health, environmental sensitivity, consumer choices and
informed skepticism. The NaturalNews Network is owned and operated by
Truth Publishing International, Ltd., a Taiwan corporation. It is not
recognized as a 501(c)3 non-profit in the United States, but it
operates without a profit incentive, and its key writer, Mike Adams,
receives absolutely no payment for his time, articles or books other
than reimbursement for items purchased in order to conduct product
reviews.
The vast majority of our content is freely given away at
no charge. We offer thousands of articles and dozens of downloadable
reports and guides (like the Honest Food Guide)
that are designed to educate and empower individuals, families and
communities so that they may experience improved health, awareness and
life fulfillment.
Who is Nina Pham? Meet the Nurse Who Contracted Ebola
byTony Dokoupil
This
undated photo made available by the Antwerp Institute of Tropical
Medicine in Antwerp, Belgium, shows the Ebola virus viewed through an
electron microscope. Antwerp Institute of Tropical Me / AP
Nina
Pham is the nurse who contracted the Ebola virus and is being treated
in Dallas, a close family friend has confirmed to NBC News Monday.
Pham
is the first patient to contract the disease while on U.S. soil,
according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which said
the transmission resulted from an unknown “breach of protocol” in
treating Thomas Eric Duncan when he returned to Texas Presbyterian a
second time. On Monday CDC director Tom Frieden clarified that he in no
way meant to place blame on the stricken nurse.
"This is a very brave person who put herself at risk to do something good for society, and is now ill," he said.
Dallas Nurse with Ebola is Clinically-Stable, says CDC4:38
Pham,
26, is a 2010 graduate of the Bachelors of Science in Nursing program
at Texas Christian University, according to Lisa Albert, a spokesperson
for the school. The four-year program prepares nurses to serve as
“liaisons among doctors, patients and other members of the health care
team,” according to the school website.
There is not a stand-alone
course on infections disease work, but infection prevention strategies
are "woven throughout all clinical coursework," according to Albert.
Precautionary methods are introduced at the start of clinical course
work, reviewed through the curriculum, and students sign an
end-of-semester document attesting to this work.
Pham was
certified by the Texas Board of Nursing in 2010, according to state
records, but she didn’t receive her certificate in Critical Care Nursing
until Aug. 1 — less than two months before Duncan arrived at Texas
Health Presbyterian critically ill with Ebola. Duncan died last week.
Ebola
nurse Nina Pham with her dog Bentley at a Dallas park. Pham filed a
lawsuit Monday against Texas Health Resources, which owns Texas Health
Presbyterian Dallas, alleging that lack of training and lack of proper
protection caused her to get Ebola. She also alleges that THR invaded
her privacy by releasing information to the public about her medical
condition, including by shooting a video of her in her hospital bed.
Nurse
Nina Pham, who contracted Ebola while caring for a patient at Texas
Health Presbyterian Hospital Dallas, filed a lawsuit Monday in Dallas
County against the hospital’s parent company, Texas Health Resources.
The
lawsuit alleges that while she became the American face of the fight
against the disease, the hospital’s lack of training and proper
equipment and violations of her privacy made her “a symbol of corporate
neglect — a casualty of a hospital system’s failure to prepare for a
known and impending medical crisis.”
Shortly after the lawsuit was
filed, Pham released a brief statement: “I was hoping that THR would be
more open and honest about everything that happened at the hospital,
and the things they didn’t do that led to me getting infected with
Ebola. But that didn’t happen and I felt I was left with no choice but
to turn to the courts for help. The fact is, I’m facing a number of
issues with regard to my health and my career and the lawsuit provides a
way to address them. But more importantly, it will help uncover the
truth of what happened, and educate all health care providers and
administrators about ways to be better prepared for the next public
health emergency. I particularly want to express my continued sympathy
to the family of Mr. Duncan, as it was my privilege to care for him. I
also want to acknowledge my fellow nurses, and the many friends, family
and strangers for their ongoing concern and support.”
Pham told The Dallas Morning News
that Texas Health Resources was negligent because it failed to develop
policies and train its staff for treating Ebola patients. She says Texas
Health Resources did not have proper protective gear for those who
treated Thomas Eric Duncan, the first person in the United State
diagnosed with the disease. He died Oct. 8.
“I wanted to believe that they would have my back and take care of me, but they just haven’t risen to the occasion,” Pham said in the interview.
Nina
Pham claims the extent of her Ebola training was a printout of
guidelines her supervisor found on the web. “The only thing I knew about
Ebola, I learned in nursing school” six years earlier, Pham said.
Nina
Pham claims the extent of her Ebola training was a printout of
guidelines her supervisor found on the web. “The only thing I knew about
Ebola, I learned in nursing school” six years earlier, Pham said.
Patients first
“I
was proud of us. We fought in the trenches together, the frontline
health care workers. That’s what nursing is about: putting the patient
first. We did what we had to do,” Pham said.
She remembers
spending hours alone with Duncan cleaning up his bodily fluids,
monitoring his vital signs and reassuring him that everything would be
OK. Pham said Duncan was in a great deal of pain and frightened but
always polite. He told her “he felt very isolated.” She held his hand
and told him she would pray for him.
But when Duncan tested
positive for Ebola, it sent panic and fear throughout Presbyterian — and
the nation. Pham, too, was frightened.
“I was the last person
besides Mr. Duncan to find out he was positive,” she said. “You’d think
the primary nurse would be the first to know. … I broke down and cried,
not because I thought I had it but just because it was a big ‘whoa, this
is really happening’ moment.”
Duncan,
who contracted the disease in his native Liberia, died Oct. 8. A few
days later, Pham tested positive for the disease. She was initially
treated at Presbyterian and then the National Institutes of Health in
Maryland with a series of experimental drugs and plasma from Dr. Kent
Brantly, an Ebola survivor.
She says that Texas Health Resources
violated her privacy while she was a patient at Presbyterian by ignoring
her request that “no information” be released about her. She said a
doctor recorded her on video in her hospital room and released it to the
public without her permission.
Charla Aldous, Pham’s attorney, put it more simply: Texas Health Resources “used Nina as a PR pawn.”
Pham
said she considered not going back to care for Duncan after his
diagnosis. Her colleagues said they wouldn’t blame her for not returning
to her job where normal 12-hour shifts had stretched to 14 or 15. Even
her mother said she didn't care if Pham lost her job.
Pham said that while she did not volunteer to care for Duncan, she felt that she couldn’t say no.
“I had a duty to take care of him,” she said. “It’s not in my nature to refuse.”
Alex Pietrowski, Staff
Eighteen Irish teenage girls have recently come forward claiming to be suffering acute physical side-effects from the controversial HPV anti-cervical cancer vaccine administered in their schools. Parents came forward after the Sunday Independent revealed similar claims of suffering from 131 young women a weekend ago.
